|
Author
|
Topic: Jack Trimarco slimed
|
polyops
Member
|
posted 03-21-2004 03:18 AM
 
http://antipolygraph.org/cgi-bin/forums/YaBB.pl?board=Policy;action=display;num=1079776633 ------------------
It's a thankless job, but somebody's gotta do it. IP: Logged |
Ted Todd
Member
|
posted 03-21-2004 09:41 AM
Polyops,Revenge is best served cold! If you read some of Georges early ramblings, you will see that it was Trimarco who conducted George's FBI polygraph and called him DI. Later, George failed an LAPD Polygraph administered by Irvin Youngblood on the same issues. Ted IP: Logged |
sackett
Moderator
|
posted 03-21-2004 12:15 PM
Any reason why this isn't posted on the Anti site as "Sour Grapes". or ."Ulterior Motives"? Or for that matter, why is this hidden on our private pages? Why not get this into the (clear) public domain? Not being hired subsequent to one test is OK (I guess) to question, but two? Must be something there, huh?!Just an idea to help discredit the attacker. Jim IP: Logged |
Ted Todd
Member
|
posted 03-21-2004 12:37 PM
Trimarco, Olgivie and Todd.The few, the proud, the slimed! IP: Logged |
J.B. McCloughan
Administrator
|
posted 03-21-2004 11:49 PM
George wants open diatribes on these issues. This focuses visitors to his site in on dialogues between George et al and the polygraph community. To my knowledge, no open debate of George’s libeling of an examiner has ever come to be a meaningful discourse. Attacking George’s credibility will get us nowhere in furthering positive press for polygraph. If we are to debate, we must choose our issues to debate and stick to just that, the issue. I have suggested in the past that we discuss those issues we would like to openly debate on the Anti site here and have one unified debate on the issue at George’s site. When there is an important issue in the press, the APA or AAPP do not have a handful of people making personal comments on the issue. There is a unified voice that is represented in one chosen individual, who is briefed and supplied with material from a meeting of the minds.These are just my own thoughts on this issue. I am interested in what the other 60+ examiners here think, as I think this is an important issue.
[This message has been edited by J.B. McCloughan (edited 03-21-2004).] IP: Logged |
Raymond J. Latimer
Member
|
posted 03-22-2004 09:42 AM
J.B.
I, for one, agree with you on this. George would love to have dissension among us.Ray L. IP: Logged |
detector
Administrator
|
posted 03-22-2004 09:46 AM
JB,You summed it very well. George would LOVE to have us attack him on his site and the very best thing is to ignore that completely. I mean its pretty flimsy what he is stating about Jack anyway. This is the best he can do now is to attack that someone is illegally displaying the FBI seal? George is not interested in facts, he's interested in spinning a perception that polygraph and polygraph examiners are snake oil salesmen. That is why I feel such a burden to fight with him on That level...perception. George will never allow a true fight based on facts, but he'll spin it as though thats what he is talking about...facts. But his reality is to shape perception...DO NOT miss that truth. ------------------
Ralph Hilliard
PolygraphPlace Owner & Operator
http://www.polygraphplace.com
IP: Logged |
Polygraph Place Bulletin Board
